图片

Suspended Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma ratcheted in the pressure around the National football league on Thursday, filing a federal libel and slander suit against league commissioner Roger Goodell. Instead of wait for a appeals of the season-lengthy, without-pay suspension Goodell gave Vilma to operate their course, Vilma visited the Eastern District of Louisiana court and stated the commissioner had forever tainted him with "ill repute."

"The faster Jonathan moves to obvious his title, the greater,Inch Vilma's attorney, Peter Ginsberg, stated.

The suit draws a obvious line with what has sometimes appeared a semantic argument between "pay-for-performance" bonuses and "bounties." The National football league keeps they incorporated under-the-table cash obligations for plays that hurt competitors between 2009 and 2011. Even though some past or present people from the Saints organization have apologized for misbehavior, not one of them have recognized the portrayal of the play as deliberately injurious.

Vilma's suit eschews such distinctions. In the court papers, he declines the whole thrust of Goodell's situation against him. For the "trolley-off" or "knockout" hits -- labels the National football league states they placed on plays that sidelined a rival for those or a part of a game title -- Vilma states the charge he was part of that's fiction.

A legal court papers say this is also true from the NFL's allegation that Vilma put $10,000 on the table throughout this year's 2010 nfl playoffs in exchange for just about any teammate who required Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner or Minnesota Vikings quarterback Favre Fined from individuals games. That, too, never happened, Vilma keeps.

"Vilma never 'pledged,' made or received obligations of any sort,Inch for such on-area activity, based on the suit. "Vilma never 'targeted' an opposing player by any means that will violate National football league rules. Vilma never engaged 'in unsafe and prohibited conduct meant to injure gamers.'"

To conclude, the suit states, "Vilma never 'embraced' a bounty program or any similar enter in breach of National football league rules."
While using language that is applicable to politicians seeking redress under libel law, Vilma accused Goodell of creating the costs against him as he understood these were false, and of doing this with "reckless disregard for that truth."

 


Comments


Comments are closed.